The Green Connection’s Strategic Lead, Liziwe McDaid, emphasizes government’s responsibility to make informed decisions that serve the public interest. “If crucial data is missing – information essential for fair and sensible decision-making – then government must reject the reports and applications. Now more than ever, as the climate crisis worsens, energy poverty persists, and food insecurity grows, the risks associated with oil and gas exploration may simply be too high. South Africans, especially those who depend on the ocean for food, livelihoods, and their way of life, cannot afford to sacrifice vital marine ecosystems. We need government to recognise that the world is moving toward a new era of innovation and sustainable alternatives that do not compromise ecosystem health.”

The organisations say that TEEPSA’s argument, that the proposed project aligns with South Africa’s climate policies, is flawed. TEEPSA cannot ignore the full lifecycle of the project in its Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) because exploration leads to production, which results in more oil and gas, and this means more carbon emissions and worsening climate change. Therefore, trying to separate exploration from production, to avoid climate scrutiny, is legally indefensible. The science is clear: fossil fuel extraction drives climate change, making this project neither necessary nor desirable under National Environmental Management Act 107 of 1998 (NEMA) principles.

David Mtshali from Natural Justice’s Defending Rights Programme says: “The Draft Scoping Report’s failure to identify oil and gas extraction activities as a factor to be assessed in the need and desirability evaluation, will result in an inadequate assessment of the proposed project’s overall need and desirability. This oversight will compromise the integrity of the environmental
assessment process and will result in non-compliance with the country’s laws and regulations on climate change and the environment in general.”

As part of the DWOB South project, TEEPSA plans to drill up to seven wells in an area spanning nearly 30,000 km² between Saldanha Bay and Kleinzee, with drilling depths reaching 3,900 metres. Experts warn that exploratory drilling at such depths carries a heightened risk of blowouts, raising concerns about South Africa’s ability to contain an oil spill of this magnitude.

McDaid warns, “This project, because it goes deeper, seems more dangerous and even riskier than the infamous Deepwater Horizon well, where a catastrophic oil spill has caused long-term harm to marine ecosystems and local coastal communities.”

Mtshali adds: “The continued pursuit of oil and gas as demonstrated by this proposed project, undermines the fundamental right of individuals to have the environment protected for the benefit of both current and future generations. Such projects are neither needed nor desirable, especially now when the world is facing a climate crisis.”