News & Events

THE GREEN CONNECTION AND ITS PARTNERS CELEBRATE A WIN FOR CIVIL SOCIETY

Civil society recently celebrated a win when SLR Consulting, on behalf of Total E&P South Africa (TEPSA), granted respondents a 30-day extension to comment on the Draft Scoping Report for further oil exploration and drilling in Block 11B/12B, along the country’s South coast. The NGO The Green Connection and its partners recently attended a severely flawed public participation process, staging a virtual walk-out protest of the proceedings.

“At a time when South Africans are preoccupied with the COVID-19 pandemic, procedurally fair public participation will be a major challenge. We are also concerned about the environmental impact assessment (EIA) process being conducted during this time, especially since no open public meetings are allowed,” says The Green Connection’s Liziwe McDaid

According to McDaid, “Millions of South Africans could potentially be affected by the decisions taken by TEPSA and the government. Talking to a handful of people cannot be considered, by any stretch, to equal meaningful public participation. We understand that the lockdown has made things more complicated, but that does not mean that proper processes do not have to be followed. These actions could have far-reaching and long-lasting impacts, and should therefore, not be rushed.”

In a letter to SLR, PetroleumSA and the Department of Mineral Resources and Energy, The Green Connection points out that the Draft Scoping Report – a complex and information-heavy document –needs more time for comment. “The stakes are very high for the potentially-affected environment, and the project, which is already quite controversial, requires expert input, which will take time.

In addition to the unreasonable timelines, there have also been other issues. This includes the use of commercial newspapers and digital access to information, rather than using media – such as radio advertisements, local notices and hard copies of the EIA documentation in public spaces – that are more accessible to the affected communities.

“It seems that no efforts have been made to notify or provide information to historically disadvantaged communities and subsistence fishers living along the affected coastline. Yet, these are the people who would mostly be affected by any catastrophic incident, such as a wellhead blowout.

McDaid says that The Green Connection seeks a postponement of the entire EIA process, at least until the lockdown restrictions are lifted, or until such time as effective notice and meaningful opportunities for public participation are afforded to historically disadvantaged communities and subsistence fishers living along the Southern Cape coast.

For any media queries, please contact Natasha on Natasha.adonis.comms@gmail.com

News & Events

Is offshore oil and gas exploration justifiable in South Africa?

TOTAL E&P SA is one of several oil and gas companies with a keen interest to tap into SA’s marine offshore oil and gas reserves. A scoping application to extend their current exploratory activities to drill 10 more deep wells is currently out for public comment. Despite the COVID-19 pandemic and the national lockdown restrictions in place, the process is going ahead excluding the participation of those without access to the internet.

Given the increased risks of oil spills and leaks associated with deep drilling and the long-term impacts of fossil fuel emissions contributing to global climate change, is it justifiable for marine offshore oil and gas exploration to even take place? The south coast of South Africa experiences some of the roughest sea conditions attributed to the fast-moving Agulhas Current. The many shipwrecks are a testament of this reality.

A recent fire at the TOTAL Formosa Road storage facility at the Durban harbour two days ago puts doubt on the safety of such an undertaking. An accident of this nature could be catastrophic under rough seas and the impact long lasting as was the case in the Deepwater Horizon oil spill off the Gulf of Mexico 10 years ago where sea conditions are calmer. Is it justifiable to put existing livelihoods such as small-scale and commercial fishing and tourism at risk? Is it justifiable to compound the negative impact on our marine species and ecosystems? Who bares the true cost?